Throughout the past 31 years transpersonal anthropologists and transpersonal psychologists seeking a scientific language to discuss anomalous phenomena and the farther reaches of human nature (or to invoke a discussion of ultimate reality, universal mind or cosmic consciousness) have referred to the holographic paradigm, the conceptual origin of which is directly related to David Bohm’s implicate order theory. In 1982 and 1984 Bohm discussed the holographic paradigm’s limitations (and more specifically his concept of holomovement) to accurately represent his implicate order theory, suggesting instead the more precise conceptual reference holoflux; yet the limited publication of this correction has not been noticed by those who continue to champion the holographic paradigm. This paper reiterates Bohm’s 1982 and 1984 correction, and discusses its implications for transpersonal theory.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Schroll, M. A. (2013). Schroll, M. A. (2013). Understanding Bohm’s holoflux: Clearing up a conceptual mistunderstanding of the holographic paradigm and clarifying its significance to transpersonal studies of consciousness. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 32(1), 140–163.. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 32 (1). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2013.32.1.140