Queer Stance: Metalinguistic attitudes towards slur reclamation among LGBTQ young adults
Presenter Title/Affiliation
University of Illinois (UIUC)
Start Date
21-5-2021 4:15 PM
Event Name
Panel discussion
Panel Number
8
Panel Chair Name
Chris Vanderstouwe
Zoom URL to Join
https://ciis.zoom.us/j/93501719118
Zoom Meeting ID
935 0171 9118
Abstract
“Queer” as an identity label has undergone significant semantic shift since the LGBT rights movements of the 1980s and 90s. Today, many consider it a “reclaimed” or ameliorated slur, as attested by the existence of Queer Studies as a discipline in major universities. Social media and legal discourse, however, show that not all LGBTQ people, institutions, and corporations are comfortable with reclaimed uses of “queer.” In this paper I explore the metalinguistic attitudes of young queer people (age 18-35) towards reclaimed use of “queer” and other anti-LGBTQ slurs.
I conducted twelve- to- twenty-minute interviews with young, self-identified members of the LGBTQ community in a college town in Central Illinois. Following Jaffe 2009, Bucholtz and Hall 2004, and a discourse analytic framework, I analyzed their stance-taking tactics towards “queer” as a slur and/or an identity label, and towards wider discourse on language and LGBTQ identity. Preliminary results suggest that these young people hold positive metalinguistic attitudes towards “queer”; their discourse positions “queer” as a useful umbrella term and/or as a marker of non-normativity in the face of mainstream trends towards homo-, hetero-, or cisnormativity. Multiple participants named “faggot” and the supposedly neutral “gay” (as opposed to “queer”) as the homophobic slurs they have heard most often at home, on the Internet, and in school settings. These interviews, and the wider discourse around LGBTQ identity labels, has implications for the study of the life cycle and semantic shift of slurs. This discourse also has bearings on institutional and legal policies surrounding the use of (reclaimed) slurs in social media, trademarks (see Anten 2016), and academic settings.
Presenter Contact
casar2@illinois.edu
Queer Stance: Metalinguistic attitudes towards slur reclamation among LGBTQ young adults
“Queer” as an identity label has undergone significant semantic shift since the LGBT rights movements of the 1980s and 90s. Today, many consider it a “reclaimed” or ameliorated slur, as attested by the existence of Queer Studies as a discipline in major universities. Social media and legal discourse, however, show that not all LGBTQ people, institutions, and corporations are comfortable with reclaimed uses of “queer.” In this paper I explore the metalinguistic attitudes of young queer people (age 18-35) towards reclaimed use of “queer” and other anti-LGBTQ slurs.
I conducted twelve- to- twenty-minute interviews with young, self-identified members of the LGBTQ community in a college town in Central Illinois. Following Jaffe 2009, Bucholtz and Hall 2004, and a discourse analytic framework, I analyzed their stance-taking tactics towards “queer” as a slur and/or an identity label, and towards wider discourse on language and LGBTQ identity. Preliminary results suggest that these young people hold positive metalinguistic attitudes towards “queer”; their discourse positions “queer” as a useful umbrella term and/or as a marker of non-normativity in the face of mainstream trends towards homo-, hetero-, or cisnormativity. Multiple participants named “faggot” and the supposedly neutral “gay” (as opposed to “queer”) as the homophobic slurs they have heard most often at home, on the Internet, and in school settings. These interviews, and the wider discourse around LGBTQ identity labels, has implications for the study of the life cycle and semantic shift of slurs. This discourse also has bearings on institutional and legal policies surrounding the use of (reclaimed) slurs in social media, trademarks (see Anten 2016), and academic settings.
https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/lavlang/2021/friday/31
